Case Law Details
Adithya Marketing Vs State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)
Introduction: The Kerala High Court, in the case of Adithya Marketing vs State Tax Officer-I, addressed the challenge to the assessment order dated 20.06.2022 (Ext.P1). This article delves into the court’s decision, highlighting the extension granted for filing appeals under Section 73/74 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017.
Detailed Analysis: The petitioner contended that the appeal period against orders under Section 73/74 had been extended until 31.01.2024, citing Notification No.53/2023 dated 02.11.2023 by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 107 before 31.01.2024. The crucial aspect is that if the appeal is filed within the stipulated time, it should be heard on merits, not hindered by the earlier rejection based on delay.
The analysis further explores the legal nuances, implications, and the practical significance of this judgment. Understanding the context of the extension and its impact on the petitioner’s right to appeal provides clarity on the evolving dynamics of indirect tax matters.
Conclusion: With a directive for the petitioner to file the appeal before 31.01.2024, the Kerala High Court’s decision in Adithya Marketing vs State Tax Officer-I marks a significant development in the realm of CGST appeals. This conclusion encapsulates the court’s disposition and underscores the importance of timely compliance in the adjudication of indirect tax disputes.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
