Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

ITC on Construction Materials & Supplies: AAR rejects application

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2024 taxguru.in 2111
Case Name
In re V Chitti Babu (GST AAR Karnataka)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

In re V Chitti Babu (GST AAR Karnataka)

The case of V Chitti Babu under GST AAR Karnataka revolves around the admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) concerning construction materials and supplies used in the construction of a Marriage & Convention hall, as well as the ITC for inward supplies of various items used in the letting out of such halls. This article delves into the details of the ruling provided by the authority, analyzing the arguments presented by the applicant and the authority’s findings.

The applicant, M/s. V Chitti Babu, sought clarification on two key aspects:

a. Admissibility of ITC on construction materials used in the construction of Marriage & Convention hall, which is subject to GST.

b. Admissibility of ITC on inward supplies such as D.G. Sets, Air Conditioners, Furniture’s, Chairs, etc., used in the business of letting out Marriage/Convention halls.

The authority examined the submissions made by the applicant and reviewed relevant provisions of the CGST Act, 2017, and the KGST Act, 2017. It was noted that the applicant’s premises were subject to inspection, and a show cause notice was issued for recovery of ineligible credit. Despite this, the applicant failed to disclose this fact in the application for advance ruling.

According to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017, an application for advance ruling cannot be admitted if the question raised is already pending or decided in any proceedings concerning the applicant under the provisions of the Act. Since the questions raised by the applicant were already pending in the show cause notice proceedings, the application for advance ruling was rejected.

In conclusion, the ruling on the admissibility of input tax credit for construction materials and supplies in the case of V Chitti Babu was determined based on the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017. The authority rejected the application for advance ruling due to the questions raised being already pending in other proceedings. This ruling emphasizes the importance of full disclosure and adherence to procedural requirements in seeking advance rulings under GST laws.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 19,725

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.