Case Law Details
Case Name : In re Vinayaka Constructions (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling AAR No. 37/AP/GST/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/12/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
AAR Andhra Pradesh Advance Rulings
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
In re Vinayaka Constructions (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh)
In the instance case, the applicant is the supplier of works contract services and the goods and services received by him for construction of immovable property (other than Plant or machinery) are neither owned nor capitalized in his own account, but passed on to the contractee. Hence even as per the provision of Section 17(5) (d), the applicant does not fall under this ineligible category. Thus the restriction contained under clause c & d of sub section 17(5) is not
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.