Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vimal Yashwantgiri Goswami Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : R/Criminal Misc. Application No. 4255 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/04/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Vimal Yashwantgiri Goswami Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court)

The details of the tax evasion of the respective accused arraigned in the complaint, reveal that the total tax evasion of the applicant’s Company Heugo Metal is shown as Rs.4,51,05,130/- which is less than 5 crores. It is further revealed that the tax liability of other company being Dattatrey Corporation, concerning the accused No.3, is also added and the total tax evasion of both the companies, is shown as Rs.7,55,76,378/-., i.e. above 5 crores. Both the companies are a seperate and distinct identity having different GST numbers. As recorded hereinabove, the residential premises of the applicant was raided in the year 2019 by now more than three years have been passed. Vide orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court, the action of cancellation of the registration of the firm M/s. Heugo Metal was also allowed. The attachment orders have also lost its validity. Even, if the tax evasion is taken more than 5 crores, the maximum punishment which can be imposed is five years. It is not disputed by the department that if the tax evasion of the applicant is less than Rs. 5 crores, then it will be a bailable offence as per the provisions of Section 132(1)(i) read with Sections 132(4) and 132(5) of the Gujarat GST Act and the Central GST Act, 2017. Considering the aforesaid observations, the applicant has carved out his case for grant of bail under the provision of section 438 of the Cr.P.C.

In the result, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest in, on his executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of like amount with certain conditions.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GUJARAT HIGH COURT

1. By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant-accused has prayed for bail in connection with File No.AC-1/ UNIT-75/BVN/201920 registered with the Office of the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax-1, Unit-75, 1st Floor, Bahumali Bhawan, Bhavnagar and File No.ACCT-UNIT-9/HEUGO METAL/SUMMONS/2021-22 registered with the Office of Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Unit-9, Division (1), Anmedabad; for the alleged offence punishable under Section 132(1)(b)(c)(f)(K)(I) of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Sections 463 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031