Case Law Details
Vahanvati Steels Through Prop. Barot Chintankumar Mahendrakumar Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court)
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos.1 and 3 respectively.
2. The respondent no.2 – Mr. Sandeep Mahendrabhai Patel, State Tax Officer, Ghatak-1, Ahmedabad, Range-1, Division-1, Gujarat has been impleaded in his personal capacity as the writ-applicant feels that he has acted in a very high-handed manner. If any Officer has been impleaded in his personal capacity, we don’t expect the AGP to appear for him and defend his action.
3. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“6(a) To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside order dated 29.03.2022 made by State Tax Officer, Ghatak 1, Ahmedabad cancelling the Goods and Service Tax Registration of petitioner, and direct restoration or revival of registration of the petitioner firm;
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
