This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No external aid for interpretation called for when language of Entry in question was clear in itself
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Authority For Clarification and Advance Ruling Vs Aakavi Spinning Mills (P) Ltd (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Authority For Clarification and Advance Ruling Vs Aakavi Spinning Mills (P) Ltd (Supreme Court)
As noticed, the Entry in question, as inserted into the Fourth Schedule to the Act, is clear and specific that is, Hank Yarn; it carries neither any ambiguity nor any confusion. Undoubtably, the yarn in the hank form (which is a unit of measure), has come for exemption under the said Entry 44; and obviously, that exemption enures to the benefit of the handloom industry too. However, for that matter, if the benefit of this broad and unambiguous entry also goes to any other industry, there is absolute...




