Bogus GST ITC- HC rejects bail to prevent Tampering of Evidence

Mr. Ashok Kumar Vs Commissioner CGST & Central Excise (Bombay High Court)

Taking into consideration, the facts of the case, though the officers under the CGST Act, cannot seek custody of the arrested persons for completing the investigation, respondent’s contention that applicant’s detention in custody is necessary to prevent him from causing the evidence of the offence to disappear or tampering such evidence is well founded. Counsel for the respondent has correctly placed reliance on Section 41 of the Criminal Proce

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.