Case Law Details
Sunil Kumar K Vs State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)
Introduction: Sunil Kumar K, a dealer under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, contested an assessment order through a writ petition before the Kerala High Court. However, the court’s decision highlighted the availability of statutory remedies under the CGST Act, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Detailed Analysis: The petitioner raised concerns regarding the availability of the assessment order on the government portal as mandated by Section 146 of the GST Act. However, the court noted that despite the order being accessible online, the petitioner downloaded it from the website, invalidating the contention. Furthermore, it emphasized the petitioner’s failure to utilize the statutory remedy of appealing to the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the GST Act.
The court’s dismissal of the writ petition underscores the principle of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking public law remedies like writ petitions. By invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner bypassed the prescribed appellate process, leading to the rejection of the petition.
Conclusion: In the case of Sunil Kumar K vs State Tax Officer-I, the Kerala High Court’s decision reinforces the importance of adhering to statutory procedures in challenging assessment orders under the CGST Act. It clarifies that writ petitions may not be entertained when statutory remedies are available, promoting the efficient resolution of tax disputes through established legal avenues. This ruling serves as a reminder for taxpayers to exhaust all available remedies before seeking judicial intervention.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
