Follow Us :

Eukti Garg

The government on 22nd December, 2018, in its GST Council meeting, released a yet another notification that might end up in people scratching their heads. According to the Notification No. 76/2018-Central Tax dated 31st December, 2018, the finance ministry has waived off the late fees for the GST registered taxpayers’ inability to file GSTR1, GSTR3B, GSTR4 for the period of July 2017 to September 2018 but gave a rider that they must furnish their returns from the period December 22, 2018 to March 2019.

On the face of it, this decision taken up by the GST council seems to be a big breather for all those who would have fetched a big amount of Rs.25 per day as late fees but were saved by this untimely notification. To some extent, I advocate for this notification as being essential in its nature because there would have been quite a amount of people who could not have come at par to this novel procedure. Moreover, the government can be applauded as it aptly uses reverse psychology and earns some brownie points for it being a populist measure. Whatever the objective be, this has definitely come as a big relief for the ones who would currently be standing in the long queues to pay the exchequer.

But that is just the rosy side. It has to have thorns. And this time those thorns pinch the honest and timely filers of the GSTR. Suppose, a person paid his late fees for the GSTR of July 2017 to September 2018 on 20th December which, say, amounts to Rs.25000. Now, I wish that person would have waited for two more days and he could have availed the benefit of 22nd December notification as well. This is the rudimentary problem with this notification i.e. its untimeliness and unfairness. The notification is unfair in the sense that it brings disappointment to the ones who cared to pay the late fees amount and those who did not would be waived off, even though they lay in the same situation.

This notification, according to me, should have been a retrospective one. That is, all those who paid the late fees amount should have been given reimbursement otherwise it would be totally unfair and unjust on the Council’s part. As is said, equals should be treated equally.

(Author Eukti Garg is 2nd Year Law Student of Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Patiala and is Daughter of CA Satish Garg based at Faridabad)

Author Bio

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.



    Hi, What about revision of incorrectly filed GSTR1 and GSTR3B for period July17 to March18. Has revision been allowed. Now that non filers have been allowed to file returns for period upto 31March18 then revision in GSTR1 and GSTR3B should also be allowed.
    Please confirm if it has been allowed now. Thanks


    Yes, tis is very unfair for those who have delayed just prior to this notification, also for the clients who filed before 31st dec, i.e on 29th dec i filed for the client, but paid late fee around 34000/-
    but for the client whom i filed on 2nd jan no late showed to them. Very very unfair treatment. Govt should refund the late fees, who filed earlier also.
    that will be logical as well as for the sake of unity among all traders.

  3. ASHOK M MEHTA says:

    I am in agreement with the author and of the strong view that the Council must review its notification no. 78/2018 and make it retrospectively to extend the benefit also to those assesses who already paid late fee as per the old provisions.

  4. Sushil Sureka says:

    Very legitimate demand. GST council should take immediate cognizance of the issue and provide relief to the Registered Persons who were unduly penalized most of the times due to portal issues.
    Sushil Sureka,
    General Secretary,
    Ahilya Chamber of Commerce & industry,

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2024