Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : TATA Aldesa (J.V.) Vs State of UP and 4 others (Allahabad High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

TATA Aldesa (J.V.) Vs State of UP and 4 others (Allahabad High Court)

Once the amount has been refunded, we do not find any good reason for not paying the interest in terms of Section 56 of the CGST Act, 2017

Allahabad High Court addressed a writ petition filed by TATA Aldesa (J.V.), seeking payment of interest on a delayed GST refund of ₹38,10,351 as mandated under Section 56 of the CGST Act, 2017. Despite the refund being credited on November 7, 2024, nearly four years after the application was completed, the petitioner argued for interest at 6% per annu

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31