Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re M/s Bakson Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Himachal Pradesh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
In re M/s Bakson Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Himachal Pradesh) The applicant is not engaged in the manufacture and supply of ENA presently. The representatives were asked to submit as to why the applicant is seeking advance ruling on this issue in view of the fact that advance ruling is binding only on the takpayer who has sought it. They were told that a ruling on this issue will not help the applicant in any way as he is not the supplier of the same. Sub-section (a) of section 95 of the HPGST/CGST Act defines advance ruling as:- “means a decision provided by the Auth...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930