Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22481 Results

Every deposit during demonetization cannot be categorized as unaccounted cash

Case Name : Yagnavalkya Souhardha Credit Co. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1086/Bang/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/01/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts : ITAT Bangalore (1081)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Repayment of cash loan by cheque doesn’t exonerate levy of penalty u/s 271D

Case Name : Ramakrishna Murali Vs ITO Ward-6(3)(1) (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 975/Bang/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/12/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2012-2013
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Bangalore (1081)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

TDS u/s 194C not deductible on security charges as it involves only supply of manpower

Case Name : PCIT Vs ATC Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 6366/Mum/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/01/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : ITAT Mumbai (3583)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Expense for computer software & its upgradation is revenue in nature

Case Name : DCIT Vs Yazdani International Pvt Ltd (ITAT Cuttack)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 294 /CTK/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/12/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Cuttack (91)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Grants used as per terms & condition for particular event held abroad doesn’t require CBDT approval

Case Name : ITO Vs Sports Goods Export Promotion Council (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4238/Del/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/09/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts : ITAT Delhi (3704)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 272A(1)(d) penalty not leviable if AO not acted on adjournment request of assessee

Case Name : B. U. Bhandari Auto Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 324/PUN/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/12/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Pune (714)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Unexplained Difference in amount specified in Form 26AS & returns – ITAT upheld addition

Case Name : Vijay Kashinath Jagtap Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1440/Mum/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/12/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Mumbai (3583)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 263 invocable as non-verification of trade discount vis-à-vis TDS makes assessment order erroneous

Case Name : Konda Srinivasaiyer Damodharan Kishori Lal Vs PCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 290/Chny/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/01/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts : ITAT Chennai (856)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Revisionary power u/s 263 not invocable as facts already examined by AO

Case Name : Sunayana Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 900/MUM/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/01/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts : ITAT Mumbai (3583)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 143(1) intimation cannot be issued for invalid return

Case Name : Rajdhani Institute of Information Technology Vs CIT(A) (ITAT Cuttack)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 133/CTK/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/12/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2014-2015
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Cuttack (91)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031