Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22458 Results

Amount collected as per direction given in Molasses Control (Amendment) Order, is deductible as revenue expenditure

Case Name : Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Salem Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd (1998) (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : 1998 229 ITR 285 Mad
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/09/1996
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Madras High Court (1750)

Section 54 – construction of house should necessarily be complete within two years

Case Name : Smt. Shashi Varma Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (MP High Court)
Appeal Number : 1997 224 ITR 107 MP
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/3/1996
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Madhya Pradesh HC (176)

Section 54F- Exemption cannot be denied if delay in completion is on account of reasons beyond the control of assessee

Case Name : Satish Chandra Gupta vs Assessing Officer (ITAT-Delhi)
Appeal Number : 1995 54 ITD 508 Delhi
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/05/1995
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14928) ITAT Delhi (3703)

There is no conflict between the provisions of sections 50 and 55(2) of the I-T Act, 1961

Case Name : Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Pierce Leslie & Co. Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : 1997 227 ITR 759 Mad
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/03/1995
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Madras High Court (1750)

SC Judgment on Whether apparent can be considered as real?

Case Name : Sumati Dayal Vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
Appeal Number : C.A. No.-001344-001345/1977
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/03/1995
Related Assessment Year : 1971-72 & 1972-73
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Order U/s. 154 includes amended order & rectified order also

Case Name : Hind Wire Industries Ltd Vs CIT (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : (1995) 212 Itr 639 (Sc)
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/01/1995
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

S. 154 : A mistake can be regarded as apparent only when it is a glaring, obvious or self-evident

Case Name : CIT Vs Lakshmi Prasad Lahkar (Gauhati High Court)
Appeal Number : (1996) 220 Itr 100 (Gau)
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/01/1994
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Guwahati High Court (119)

Somaiya Orgeno Chemicals Ltd. Vs. CIT (1995) 216 ITR 291

Case Name : Somaiya Orgeno-Chemicals Ltd. Vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : 1995 216 ITR 291 Bom
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/12/1993
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Bombay High Court (1878)

CIT vs Tarachand Kalyanji (Bombay High Court)

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income-Tax Vs Tarachand Kalyanji (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : 1993 204 ITR 43 Bom
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/02/1993
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Bombay High Court (1878)

Addition for notional interest in absence of actual receipt not justified

Case Name : Highways Construction Co Pvt Ltd Vs CIT (Guwahati High Court)
Appeal Number : Equivalent Citation - (1993) 199 ITR 702 (Gau)
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/11/1992
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Guwahati High Court (119)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031