Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Shashi Varma Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (MP High Court)
Appeal Number : 1997 224 ITR 107 MP
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/3/1996
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

In this case the assessee was denied exemption on the investments made with Delhi Development Authority. However, relief was granted by the Hon’ble High Court. It was held that section 54 of the Act of 1961 only says that within two years, the assessee should have constructed the house but that does not mean that the construction of house should necessarily be complete within two years. What it means is that the construction of house should be completed as far as possible within two years. In the modern days, it is not easy to construct a house within the time-limit of two years and under the Government schemes, takes years and years. Therefore, confining to two years’ period for construction and handing over possession thereof is impossible and unworkable under section 54 of the Act. If substantial investment is made in the construction of house, then it should be deemed that sufficient steps have been taken and this satisfies the requirements of section 54.  Therefore, the view taken by the Tribunal is not correct. Full Text of the Judgment is as follows :-

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
HON’BLE SHRI A. K. MATHUR, CJ & HON’BLE SHRI S.K. KULSHRESTHA, J.
Smt. Shashi Varma
Vs.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031