Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22458 Results

CIT vs J. K. Investor (Bombay) Ltd. (Bombay High Court)

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs J. K. Investor (Bombay) Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : 2000 112 TAXMAN 107 Bom
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/06/2000
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Bombay High Court (1878)

Gujarat Gas Ltd vs. JCIT (2000) – Gujarat High Court- 245 ITR 84

Case Name : Gujarat Gas Co. Ltd. Vs Commissioner Of Income Tax (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : 2000 245 ITR 84 Guj
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/04/2000
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Gujarat High Court (1139)

M/s. Chelmsford Club Vs CIT (Supreme Court)

Case Name : M/S. Chelmsford Club Vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : (2000) 243 ITR 89 (SC)
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/03/2000
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation Vs. CIT – Supreme Court

Case Name : Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation Vs. CIT (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/02/2000
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

Beneficial ownership is relevant than legal ownership to claim depreciation – SC

Case Name : Mysore Minerals Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income-tax (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : [1999] 239 ITR 775 (SC)
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/09/1999
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

When information discovered during search capable of generating satisfaction for issuing a notice cannot become irrelevant for further action

Case Name : ACIT Vs Manorama Devi  (ITAT Allahabad)
Appeal Number : Miscellaneous Application (M.A.) No. 16/Alld./2017 arising out of ITA No.135/ALLD/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/03/2021
Related Assessment Year : Block Period 01.04.1989 to 08.12.1999
Courts : All ITAT (14928) ITAT Allahabad (33)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

S.195 TDS is deductible only on Taxable Portion

Case Name : Transmission Corporation Of A.P. Ltd. And Anr. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, A.P. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : 1999 Supp(1) SCR 504
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/08/1999
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

Penalty on Declaration of additional income to buy peace with Department?

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Suresh Chandra Mittal (MP High Court)
Appeal Number : 2000 241 ITR 124 MP
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/07/1999
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Madhya Pradesh HC (176)

A married lady of reputed family is expected to own 500 gms of ornaments

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Ghanshyam Das Johri (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 19 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/10/2013
Related Assessment Year : Block period 01-04-1989 to 08-07-1999
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Allahabad High Court (800)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Sales amount by itself cannot represent income of assessee who has not disclosed sales

Case Name : CIT Vs President Industries (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : (2002) 258 ITR 654 (Guj)
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/4/1999
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Gujarat High Court (1139)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031