Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Filter Judiciary

Found 22458 Results

Rohitasava Chand Versus Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court)

Case Name : Rohitasava Chand Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 611 of 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/03/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Delhi High Court (3365)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Validity of Selection of case for scrutiny assessment-Selection contrary to CBDT’s instructions

Case Name : CIT vs Best Plastics (P) Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : 295 ITR 256
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/04/2006
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Delhi High Court (3365)

"Surcharge in block will be leviable even before the insertion of provisio" SC

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Central Vs Suresh N. Gupta (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 32 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/01/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Deduction on actual payment – Payments towards PF and ESIC

Case Name : CIT vs Dharmendra Sharma (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 644 of 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/11/2007
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Delhi High Court (3365)

Immunity from penalty as provided under Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) despite non disclosure of manner in which income is derived

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Mahendra C. Shah (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : (2008) 215 CTR Guj 493, 2008 299 ITR 305 Guj
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/02/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Gujarat High Court (1139)

CBDT is duty bound to refer matter to transfer pricing officer of international transaction exceeding Rs. 5 crores

Case Name : Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs Additional Commissioner of Income-tax (ITAT Delhi 'H' Bench)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 2146 (Delhi) of 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/01/2008
Related Assessment Year : 2004-05
Courts : All ITAT (14928) ITAT Delhi (3703)

Increase in turnover cannot be the sole criteria for steep increase in remuneration payable to director

Case Name : Shree Laxmi Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1657/PN/2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/01/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14928) ITAT Pune (713)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Income Tax – damages paid for non-fulfillment of contractual obligations – allowable expenditure – But, any sum paid for infraction of law, not allowab

Case Name : M/s. Jamna Auto Industries Yamunanagar Vs The Comissioner of Income Tax, Haryana,Rohtak (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Reference No. 56 of 1987
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/1/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Punjab and Haryana HC (456)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Defining "Export Turnover" for Sec- 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Case Name : Iseva Systems Pvt Ltd Vs The Asstt Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Bangalore 'B' Bench
Appeal Number : ITA No. 401/Bang/2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/12/2007
Related Assessment Year : 2003-04
Courts : All ITAT (14928) ITAT Bangalore (1080)

Interest paid on the capital borrowed for the acquisition of an asset cannot be allowed as a revenue expenditure

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana Vs M/s Vardhman Polytex Limited (Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No.1 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/01/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13909) Punjab and Haryana HC (456)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031