Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22508 Results

Allowbility of kickbacks/secret commission as business expenditure under section 37(1) of IT Act

Case Name : Kusum R. Ghuwalewala Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. : ITA No. 3408/Mum/2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/02/2009
Related Assessment Year : 2001- 2002
Courts : All ITAT (14959) ITAT Mumbai (3584)

Power of Commissioner under section 263 of Income-tax Act

Case Name : Rajesh Goyal & Sons Vs CIT (ITAT Agra)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. : ITA No. 204/Agr./2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/12/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14959) ITAT Agra (125)

Applicability of section 292B of IT Act in case return contains any mistake, defect or omission

Case Name : Nicholas Applegate South East Asia Fund Limited Vs Assistant Director of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No: 3875/Mum/2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/01/2009
Related Assessment Year : 2001- 02
Courts : All ITAT (14959) ITAT Mumbai (3584)

When an order can be said to be erroneous for exercise of power of revision under section 263 of IT Act : ITAT Mumbai

Case Name : Pravin Navin Investments & Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. : ITA Nos. 3461 & 3518/M/2001
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/01/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14959) ITAT Mumbai (3584)

Provisions of S.40 cannot be invoked where the income is to be computed U/s.42 of the Act

Case Name : Cairn Energy India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Chennai 'D' Bench)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 208 to 211 (Mds)/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/02/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14959) ITAT Chennai (858)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

S. 115JA assessment is not liable for advance tax interest u/s 234B and 234C

Case Name : Snowcem Vs. DCIT (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 238 Of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/01/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13965) Bombay High Court (1884)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Advances to sister concerns must be presumed to have come out of own funds and not borrowed funds

Case Name : CIT vs. Reliance Utilities (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 1398 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/01/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13965) Bombay High Court (1884)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Reopening notice even if served after limitation period is valid: HC DELHI

Case Name : Mayawati Vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 8768/2008 and CM No. 16842/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/02/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13965) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

“Sham” lease transactions cannot be given relief as “financial arrangements”.

Case Name : M Corp Global Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income-tax, Ghaziabad (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 955 /2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/02/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Exercise of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Case Name : Flextronics Software System Ltd. Vs CIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ITA No. 2070/DEL/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/01/2009
Related Assessment Year : 2003- 2004
Courts : All ITAT (14959) ITAT Delhi (3710)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031