Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22506 Results

S.240 of the IT Act, 1961 cast obligation on the revenue to effect the refund

Case Name : S. Thigarajan Vs ACIT (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 11044 of 2009 (T-IT)
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/08/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13964) Karnataka High Court (637)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Deduction U/s. 80-IB(10) need to be given proportionally if a few residential units are exceeding the built-up area of 1500 sq. ft prescribed by section

Case Name : ITO Vs AIR Developers (ITAT Nagpur)
Appeal Number : ITA NO. 447/Nag/2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/05/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14958) ITAT Nagpur (29)

Not allowing cross examination is procedural defect and will not make an assessment null and void

Case Name : Centurion Investment & International Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 85/Del/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/05/2009
Related Assessment Year : 1999- 2000
Courts : All ITAT (14958) ITAT Delhi (3709)

Brokerage paid on renting of property not allowable u/s. 23 and 24 of the Income Tax Act

Case Name : Tube Rose Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4530/Del/2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/05/2008
Related Assessment Year : 2001- 2002
Courts : All ITAT (14958) ITAT Delhi (3709)

Despite s. 271(1B), s. 271 (1)(c) penalty is not valid if AO’s satisfaction not recorded at stage of initiation

Case Name : Madhushree Gupta Vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : WP(C) No. 5059 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/07/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13964) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Even Best Judgment assessment cannot be made without giving opportunity of being heard has to be given to assessee

Case Name : Harjinder Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 46 & 47 (ASR)/ 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/09/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14958) ITAT Amritsar (160)

Validity of levy of penalty for not furnishing the return of income within the prescribed time

Case Name : Sanjay Agarwal @ Sanjay S. Agarwal Vs. ACIT (ITAT Agra)
Appeal Number : ITA NO. 440/Agr./2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/05/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14958) ITAT Agra (125)

Tribunal is not competent to recall its previous order and re-write the same again and reverse the earlier decision taken on merit

Case Name : Adarshveer P. Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : MA Nos. 230 & 231/Mum/09
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/06/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14958) ITAT Mumbai (3584)

Once capital asset is converted into stock-in-trade provision of section 2(47) becomes irrelevant and does not apply

Case Name : R.Gopinath (HUF) Vs. ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA Nos. 29 & 30/Mds/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/07/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14958) ITAT Chennai (858)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

AAR on taxability of payments made by applicant to a British company for rendering telecom services in India

Case Name : Cable & Wireless Networks India Pvt. Ltd., In re (Authority for Advance Rulings)
Appeal Number : AAR No. 789 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/06/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031