Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22499 Results

Advance Against Depreciation (AAD) is not a reserve so section 115JB not applicable

Case Name : National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. CIT (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 6 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/01/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Deductibility of premium on forward contracts in the year of entering into such contracts

Case Name : CIT Vs. Industrial Finance Corporation of India (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)

TDS not deductible on freight chargers shown separately in Goods Purchase Bill

Case Name : CIT Vs. Bhagwati Steels (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 693 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/01/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Punjab and Haryana HC (457)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Payment made for composite arrangement under franchises agreement not liable for TDS

Case Name : CIT Vs NIIT Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)

Right to set-off loss is a “vested right” which is available despite amendment in year of set-off

Case Name : Geetanjali Trading Limited Vs. The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 5428/ MUM/ 2007
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)

AO deemed to have applied his mind if facts are on record

Case Name : CIT, Delhi Vs. M/s. Kelvinator of India Limited (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : (2010) 320 ITR 561 (SC) : (2010) 2 SCC 723
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/01/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Amount paid for compounding of offence not allowable u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Case Name : Millennia Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ITA No. 810/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/01/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Karnataka High Court (635)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Duplication of computer software or processing of recordable media on blank CD amounts to ‘manufacture’

Case Name : Oracle Software India Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)

Concept of “change of opinion” stands obliterated WEF 01.04.1989?

Case Name : CIT Vs Kelvinator of India Limited (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal Nos. 2009-2011 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/01/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Shares activity treated as investment in earlier years cannot be treated as business in subsequent years if facts are the same

Case Name : CIT Vs. Gopal Purohit (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 1121 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/01/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031