Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22504 Results

Speculative loss of earlier years can be set off against profit earned on delivery-based share trading or deemed speculative business profit

Case Name : CIT Vs. Lokmat Newspapers (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 3005 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Bombay High Court (1883)

Payment made in pursuance of Cost Contribution Agreement by various entities of a Group in the R & D activities carried out centrally would not be liable to tax in India: AAR

Case Name : ABB Limited (Authority for Advance Rulings)
Appeal Number : A.A.R. No. 834 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Netting of Interest receipt not allowed for Calculating deduction u/s. 80HHC: Bombay HC

Case Name : CIT Vs. M/s. Asian Star Co. Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 200 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/03/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Bombay High Court (1883)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Reassessment – no new material or information – not allowed

Case Name : Satnam Overseas Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Additional CIT (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : Nos. 1533, 1534, 3208 To 3211, 3220 & 3221 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/12/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Delhi High Court (3377)

Penalty – additions accepted does not necessarily attract penalty

Case Name : Nemchand Jain & Sons Vs. Deputy CIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : IT(SS)A No. 21/Kol/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/10/2009
Related Assessment Year : 1989-90 to 1999-2000
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Kolkata (1036)

Penalty cannot be levied u/s 271D for receiving cash from borrower by a lender in violation of section 269SS

Case Name : DCIT Vs Ankush Rao Ingle (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 8 to 10/ Hyd/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/03/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Hyderabad (630)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Notice–143(2)- validity of service – notice by affixture- important issues dealt with

Case Name : Badaram B. Mali Vs. Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 6163/Mum/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 2005- 06
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Mumbai (3584)

Unless there is money borrowed or debt incurred, provisions of TDS u/s. 194A are not attracted

Case Name : CIT Vs. Sahib Chits (Delhi) (P) Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 44 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/07/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Validity of S.147 reopening has to be determined based on law prevailing on date of issue of S.148 notice

Case Name : Rallis India Limited Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 2514 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/03/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Bombay High Court (1883)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Revised return filed after intimation under section 143(1)(a) but within time limit–Duty of Assessing Officer to process

Case Name : CIT Vs. Himgiri Foods Limited (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : No. 138 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/03/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Gujarat High Court (1140)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031