Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22499 Results

Whether non-competition fee paid to assessee allowable as revenue expenditure?

Case Name : Procter & Gamble Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs JCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3596/Mum/2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/07/2011
Related Assessment Year : 1997- 98
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Entire mobilization/demobilization revenues received by the applicant with respect to seismic data acquisition and/or processing would be taxable in India at an effective rate of 4.223% – AAR

Case Name : Re. Western Geco International Limited Vs. DDIT (International Taxation), Dehradun (AAR Delhi)
Appeal Number : A.A.R. No. 938 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/07/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Eligibility for exemption under section 54B in respect of amount invested in agricultural land against gain from sale of agricultural land

Case Name : Krishna Murthy Vallu Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 530/Vizag/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/08/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 08
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Visakhapatnam (139)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Claiming of deduction with full disclosure on a debatable issue while filing ROI, penalty not warranted

Case Name : Hero Honda Motors Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : I.T.A No. 2698 /Del/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/05/2011
Related Assessment Year : 1998- 99
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Delhi (3706)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

When the assessee carries out jobwork as a sub-contract to make article marketable, it is entitled to claim Sec 80HH benefits

Case Name : Sundaram Fasteners Limited Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax- II (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : T.C. (A) Nos. 752 and 753 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Madras High Court (1763)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Depreciation of the windmills purchased in the same year, prior to the date of search, should be granted in the regular assessment

Case Name : CIT, Chennai Vs A R Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case (Appeal) No. 881 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Madras High Court (1763)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Loss incurred from the insurance fund liable to be excluded in computing the actuarial valuation surplus in view of the fact that the income from that Fund is exempt u/s 10(23AAB)

Case Name : CIT, Mumbai Vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 3693 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

When Revenue detects unexplained expenditure in the name of doctors of the hospital, Sec 69C additions in the hand of the hospital can be made only after doctors deny receiving such payments

Case Name : CIT Vs M/s Lakshmi Hospital (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 56, 60, 61
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Kerala High Court (909)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Submitting inaccurate claim would not amount to giving inaccurate particulars, Penalty can not be imposed U/s. 271(1)(c)

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Brahmaputra Consortium Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 1582 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

A.O. cannot issue notice U/s. 148 on the basis of scanty and vague information and material which do not indicate escapement of income

Case Name :  Signature Hotels (P) Ltd. Vs. ITO (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 8067/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/07/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031