Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22494 Results

Assessee can maintain two separate portfolios, one for investment & other for business of dealing in shares

Case Name : M/s. Smaa Trade Invest P. Ltd. Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 7531/Mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/07/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Not necessary for assessee to own Plant and Machinery to Claim deduction U/s. 80IB

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shri Jyoti Prakash Dutta (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal no.540 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/07/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Assessee cannot be held liable for non payment of TDS by deductor

Case Name : ACIT Vs Om Prakash Gattani (Guwahati High Court)
Appeal Number : Equivalent citations: 2000 242 ITR 638 Gauhati
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/01/2000
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Guwahati High Court (119)

Assessee not required to pay tax to the extent to which it has been deducted from relevant income

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Ranoli Investment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Equivalent citations: (1998) 146 CTR Guj 745
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/03/1998
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Gujarat High Court (1140)

Business loss can be set off against addition u/s. 68 or undisclosed income

Case Name : M/s. K.R. Automobiles Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahemdabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No.1972/Ahd/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/02/2014
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Ahmedabad (1127)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Purchases cannot be bogus for mere listing of supplier as hawala dealer

Case Name : Shri Rajeev G. Kalathil Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.6727/Mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/08/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Disallowance U/s. 14A cannot exceed expenditure claimed as a deduction

Case Name : ACIT Vs Iqbal M. Chagala (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 877/Mum/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/07/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Dividend Taxable if Company from whom it received has not paid dividend distribution tax

Case Name : District Cooperative Bank Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 2984/Del/2013 & 2985/Del/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/08/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Delhi (3705)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Penalty cannot be levied merely because an amount is not allowed or taxed as income

Case Name : DCIT  Vs Crew Bos Products Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA no. 1948/DEL/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/08/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14952) ITAT Delhi (3705)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Reopening Reasons to believe must be based on new tangible materials

Case Name : Madhukar Khosla Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 1320/2014, C.M. NO.2744/2014 & 2745/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/08/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13951) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031