Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 1695 Results

Compounding application can be rejected on ground of suppression of facts if omitted fact was material to relief claimed by applicant

Case Name : Girish B. Mishra Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. E/1313 OF 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Ahmedabad (818)

If job worker not availed ST exemption, Service Receiver can claim Input Credit

Case Name : Royal Touch Aluminium (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/598/WZB/AHD/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/04/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Ahmedabad (818)

Assessee could not seek indirect refund of CENVAT Credit and pass on excess input credit to buyers

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Inductotherm (I) Pvt. Ltd. (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Appeal No. 1744 Of 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Gujarat High Court (1144)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Bombay HC too stays coercive recovery pursuant to CBEC circular

Case Name : Uhde India Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : WP 380 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Bombay High Court (1906)

Delay in passing of review order by CCE cannot be condoned

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs KAP Cones (CESTAT New Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/881 OF 2012-EX[DB]
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Delhi (916)

Services having nexus with manufacture and services for optimizing productivity and services for compliance with laws are input services

Case Name : Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow (CESTAT New Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. 1540 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/04/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Delhi (916)

Goods not physically bearing brand name sold from branded outlets not eligible for SSI Exemption – SC

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/s Australian Foods India (P) Ltd (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 2826 OF 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2389)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Delay not condonable if defect not rectified within reasonable period

Case Name : Lakshmi Printing Co.Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Punjab And Hariyana High Court)
Appeal Number : CEA NO. 19 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Punjab and Haryana HC (459)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Client Referral income earned from banks & insurance co. is ‘Business Auxiliary Services’

Case Name : TVS Motor Co. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. St/476/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Chennai (649)

No Criminal Prosecution if demand itself been set aside

Case Name : Assistant Collector of Central Excise Vs M/s Karnataka Chemicals (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Criminal Appeal No. 2677 Of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Karnataka High Court (655)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031