Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Filter Judiciary

Found 1687 Results

Place of Removal: In Case Of Tariff Value U/s. 3 & Valuation U/s. 4(A)

Case Name : Ultratech Cement Ltd. Vs CCE (Chhattisgarh High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case No. 08 of 2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/08/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Cenvat Credit cannot be denied on mere non payment by the supplier -SC

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/s. Kay Kay Industries (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 7031 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/08/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Mistake in show-cause notice can be rectified before adjudication

Case Name : Cauvery Iron & Steel (India) Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 738 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Tribunal can rectify an apparent error found in order by replacing it with another

Case Name : Paramount Communication Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : MISC. ORDER NO. ST/M/409/2012-CUS(PB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/10/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Interest on delayed refund starts on expiry of 3 months from date of receipt of application for refund

Case Name : Shri Jagdamba Polymers Ltd. Vs Union of India & 2 (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Special Civil Application No. 3163 Of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Gujarat High Court (1139)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No stay based on balance sheets if assessee prima facie guilty of suppression of provision of services & receipts therefrom

Case Name : M/S Musk Tobacoo (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Commissioner, Central Excise & Serivce Tax (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Central Excise Appeal No. 30 Of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Allahabad High Court (800)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

In case of short receipt of payment post intimation U/s. 73(3) department must send a letter asking for payment instead of SCN

Case Name : VSE Stock Services Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara-II (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/1673/WZB/AHD/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Appeal can be dismissed for non-compliance with provisions of sec. 35F of Excise Act, 1962

Case Name : Gupta Builders Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 55378 Of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Writ petition not maintainable if effective alternate remedy available

Case Name : The Commissioner Salem Municipal Corporation Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 32176 Of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Madras High Court (1758)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

CCE cannot claim to be more loyal than the King

Case Name : Union of India Vs Ind Metal Extrusions (P.) Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. (C) No. 504 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Delhi High Court (3368)
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031