Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22485 Results

Bright line test not appropriate for benchmarking AMP expenses

Case Name : Haier Appliances India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 2279/DEL/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/09/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Courts : All ITAT (14947) ITAT Delhi (3704)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Reopening without bringing out any fresh material on record is unjustified

Case Name : ACIT Vs Shiv Offset India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Indore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 977/Ind/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/09/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts : All ITAT (14947) ITAT Indore (160)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Reassessment not valid if No notice under section 143(2) issued to assessee

Case Name : Supertron Electronics Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2290 & 2291/Kol/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/09/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts : All ITAT (14947) ITAT Kolkata (1034)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No illegality on Transport of Goods from one place of Business to other

Case Name : Same Deutzfahr India P Ltd Vs State of Telangana (Telangana High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No.13392 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/09/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13939) Telangana High Court (141)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Addition based on mere Whatsapp messages is not sustainable

Case Name : ACIT Vs Shri Manchukonda Shyam (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 87/Viz/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/09/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts : All ITAT (14947) ITAT Visakhapatnam (139)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No penalty on additional income admitted though there was no evidence

Case Name : ACIT Vs Deccan Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 572/VIZ/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/09/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts : All ITAT (14947) ITAT Visakhapatnam (139)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Income which did not accrue could not be taxed as business income

Case Name : Continental Construction Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4710/Del/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/09/2020
Related Assessment Year : 1995-96
Courts : All ITAT (14947) ITAT Delhi (3704)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Advance from Developer cannot be treated as ‘Windfall’ gain & taxed

Case Name : CIT Vs. City Lubricants Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case Appeal No. 439 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/09/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Courts : All High Courts (13939) Madras High Court (1758)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Forfeited Security deposit given for lease allowable as Business Loss

Case Name : DCIT Vs Ebony Retail Holdings Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA. No. 2825/Del./2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/08/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Courts : All ITAT (14947) ITAT Delhi (3704)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

AO cannot reopen a case to re-examine issue examined during original assessment

Case Name : DCIT Vs Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd (ITAT Cuttack)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 399/CTK/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/09/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2011-2012
Courts : All ITAT (14947) ITAT Cuttack (91)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031