Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : K.L. Hakkim Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

K.L. Hakkim Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai held that remand order of de novo adjudication being passed after 18 years is liable to be set aside as department failed to explain the humongous delay.

Facts- It was noticed that during the years 1984-85 and 1985-86, the appellant made clearances without accounting for the same and without paying central excise duty. Accordingly, it

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31