Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : K.L. Hakkim Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
K.L. Hakkim Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that remand order of de novo adjudication being passed after 18 years is liable to be set aside as department failed to explain the humongous delay. Facts- It was noticed that during the years 1984-85 and 1985-86, the appellant made clearances without accounting for the same and without paying central excise duty. Accordingly, it was found that the appellant was liable to pay duty of Rs.17,96,241/-. Show cause notice dt. 05.05.1989 was issued to them proposing to demand duty, interest and for imposing...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930