Case Law Details
Case Name : C.C.E. Vs M/s Avi Sales Pvt Ltd. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ld. Advocate Shri S. J. Vyas for the appellant submitted that in the present appeals the appellants are challenging the order on the ground that imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of CEA,1944 against the appellant company and personal penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules,2002 on the Director is unjustified. The Ld. Advocate for the Appellants submits that the appellant under a bonafide belief, cleared the goods at NIL rate of duty and major portion of the demand relates to their trading sales. It is his contention that the demand confirmed initially was reduced to Rs. 3,92,051/-...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

