Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ponni Sugars (Erode) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ponni Sugars (Erode) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that levy of excise on bagasse and press mud was under litigation, hence the amount of credit reversed under Rule 6(3A) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has been reversed under protest and refund claim of such reversal done under protest is not hit by time-bar. Facts- The appellant filed refund claim for refund of the payment made by them under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 on clearance of the waste products namely bagasse and press mud which emerged during the course of manufacture of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930