Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Capital Ispat Ltd. Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Capital Ispat Ltd. Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)

CESTAT Delhi held that amount deposited prior to adjudication but not held as payable under SVLDR Scheme is liable to be refunded back to the appellant.

Facts- During the course of adjudication proceedings, the appellant had deposited INR 17,38,023/- towards interest. However, post introduction of ‘Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019’ the interest of INR 17,38,023/- was not required to be paid and hence it was ordered that the sa

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31