Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs Navinchandra Dalpatlal Mehta & Anr. (Gujarat High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

PCIT Vs Navinchandra Dalpatlal Mehta & Anr. (Gujarat High Court)

Gujarat High Court held that voluntary addition offered during hearing of the application u/s. 245D(4) cannot be equated with revision of application of disclosure made u/s. 245C(1) and hence no interference is called in the impugned order passed by the Settlement Commission.

Facts- The search and seizure action u/s. 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was carried out at the premises of the assessee – respondent No.1 on 17.08.2016. During the course of search, various incriminating documents

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930