This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Excise Valuation Rule 8 Inapplicable to Prototype Vehicle Testing Clearances: CESTAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
The appellants, manufacturers of prototype commercial vehicles, cleared prototype trucks to their own manufacturing units for testing after paying central excise duty by determining value under Section 4(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 4 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The Department contended that the clearances were to the appellants’ own units for commercial purposes and, therefore, valuation should be made under Rule 8 at 110% of the cost of production. Althou...






