This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 69A Addition Deleted as Cash Deposits Were Business Turnover: ITAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sakthi Traders Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sakthi Traders Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in the business of running a hardware store, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring total income of Rs.97,940. After scrutiny proceedings under Sections 143(2) and 142(1), the Assessing Officer (AO) noted cash deposits of Rs.27,07,500 in the assessee’s bank account, including Rs.22,51,000 deposited in specified bank notes during the demonetisation period. As the assessee did not furnish documentary evidence explaining the deposits or comply with the notices, the AO completed the assessment...






