Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Mettur Thermal Power Station Vs CCE (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No 17282 of 2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/07/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CA Nischal Agarwal

Nischal AgarwalThe issue is no longer res integra as held in case of M/s METTUR THERMAL POWER STATION vs CCE [W.P. No 17282 of 2014] pronounced by Hon’ble Madas High Court wherein a collosal demand was raised on the premise that Fly Ash & Fly Ash Bricks has been removed without payment of appropriate excise duty leviable thereon.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner was engaged in the generation of electricity by burning coal resulting in production of Fly Ash as by-product which has commercial value in the market and thus it can be said that Fly Ash is marketable. The petitioner sold part of such fly ash generated to cement companies without paying any duty thereon levied vide Notification No 01/2011 dated 01-03-2011.

Arguments

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

3 Comments

  1. CA Nischal Agarwal says:

    Dear Vinod,

    Hon’ble Allahabad high court in case of Balrampur Chini Mills held that bagasse is not a manufactured product and thus liability to pay excise duty thereon does not arise.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031