This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CENVAT Credit on GTA Services | Place of Removal | Bata India | CESTAT Remanded Issue back to AO
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Bata India Limited Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Bata India Limited Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Learned Advocate for the appellant would submit that the Adjudicating Authority has mis-directed in denying the CENVAT Credit and that the Commissioner has not appreciated the facts of the case properly nor has she examined the facts of the case from the perspective of the directions of the Hon’ble High Court. He would seriously contend that in view of the amended provisions, especially Rule 2(l) read with Rule 2(t) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, the ‘place of removal’ is the place from where the goods ar...
