Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. vs. CCEX, Vadodara (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 3263-24 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/05/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief facts of the case:

Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Limited (IPCL) is engaged in the manufacture of various types of petrochemicals, falling under Chapter 27 and 29 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

One of the products which is manufactured by IPCL is C4 Raffinate, for which the company is paying central excise duty @ 8 per cent availing the benefit of Notification No. 6/2000 dated 01.03.2000 against the normal rate of 16%.

The IPCL has classified the product under chapter sub-heading 2711.19.i.e Other Petroleum & gaseous hydrocarbons. As per the Department, the aforesaid product should have been classified under Chapter Heading 2711.12 as butylene. Subsequently, a show cause notice was issued demanding IPCL to pay differential 8% duty. The IPCL replied to the show cause notice sticking to its position that the as per the aforesaid exemption Notification, 50% of the duty of excise specified in the First Schedule, was payable.

The Commissioner of Central Excise (adjucating authority) unsatisfied with the plea of assessee passed an order raising the demand for 8% differential duty.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031