Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Van Shah Fragrance Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 309 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/08/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Van Shah Fragrance Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)

CESTAT Kolkata held that bona fide belief that goods manufactured and cleared were not subject to excise duty needs to be established. Duty demand is sustainable in case the bona fide belief is not established.

Facts-

Revenue was of the view that Appellant 1, will not be eligible for the benefit of SSI Exemption under the Notifications 8/2002 dated 01/03/2002 as well as 8/2003 dated 1/3/2003, in as much as the assessee had manufactured and cleared Soya Products bearing the brand name of another person. After conclusion of investigation, Show Cause Notice dated 07/04/2008 was issued to the Appellant 1 as well as the two directors (Appellant 2 and Appellant 3) proposing the demand of Central Excise Duty for the disputed period, without the benefit of SSI Notification.

The show cause notice was adjudicated and demand was confirmed. Being aggrieved, the appellants have preferred the present appeal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031