This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mere Retracted Statements Insufficient for Customs Act Penalties: CESTAT
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rafeek K.T. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rafeek K.T. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
Introduction: In a significant decision, CESTAT Bangalore has ruled in the case of Rafeek K.T. vs Commissioner of Customs that retracted statements without corroborative evidence are insufficient for imposing penalties under Sections 112 and 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants contested the penalties imposed by the Adjudication Authority, arguing that the findings lacked admissible evidence and any act of omission on their part to abet the illegal import of goods by M/s Pushpa Telecom through undervaluation.
Detailed Analysis:
...





