Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Mere Retracted Statements Insufficient for Customs Act Penalties: CESTAT

Case Law Details

Case Name
Rafeek K.T. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Rafeek K.T. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore) Introduction: In a significant decision, CESTAT Bangalore has ruled in the case of Rafeek K.T. vs Commissioner of Customs that retracted statements without corroborative evidence are insufficient for imposing penalties under Sections 112 and 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants contested the penalties imposed by the Adjudication Authority, arguing that the findings lacked admissible evidence and any act of omission on their part to abet the illegal import of goods by M/s Pushpa Telecom through undervaluation. Detailed Analysis: ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *