Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jutla & Co. Vs Commissioner of Vat (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 771/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : CM No. 2993/2023
Related Assessment Year : 09/02/2023
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jutla & Co. Vs Commissioner of Vat & Anr. (Delhi High Court)

Delhi High Court held that failure on the part of Objection Hearing Authority (OHA) to pass an order doesn’t automatically result in allowing refund u/s. 42(1) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004.

Facts- The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the respondents be directed to refund an amount of ₹14,12,185/-along with interest in terms of Section 42 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (the DVAT Act). The petitioner had filed its Value Added Tax (VAT) return for the quarter 01.04.2017 to 30.06.2017, on 28.09.2017.

According to the petitioner, in terms of the said return, refund of ₹14,12,185/- of VAT was due for the said period.

AO did not accept the said returns and framed a default assessment of VAT for the year 2014­-15 and 2016-17. The petitioner filed its objections before the Objection Hearing Authority. However, the same were dismissed. Concededly, the OHA has not passed any order pursuant to the remand by the Tribunal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031