Case Law Details

Case Name : Principal Commissioner of Custom Vs Riso India (P.) Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : (2015) 63 205
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5989) Delhi High Court (1604)

CA Bimal Jain

CA Bimal JainFacts:

Riso India (P.) Ltd. (the Respondent) was belatedly allowed refund claim of Special Additional Duty of Customs (SAD) filed on March 2, 2010. However the claim of interest on the SAD was rejected on the ground that the Respondent had not specifically claimed interest and Section 27A of the Customs Act is not applicable for the interest on refund of SAD.


The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi relied upon the following judgments:

  • KSJ Metal Impex (P.) Ltd. Under Secretary (Cus.), M.F. (D.R) [(2013) 40 199 (Mad.)]
  • Sony India (P.) Ltd. Commissioner of Customs [(2014) 44 475/45 GST 322 (Delhi)]

and held that ‘Duty’ as defined in Section 2(15) of the Customs Act, is wide enough to cover all kinds of duty, including SAD. Hence, as per Section 3(8) of Customs Tariff Act, provisions of Customs Act insofar as they relate to ‘refund’ and ‘interest on delayed refund’ viz. Sections 27 and 27A ibid would apply to refund of SAD. Where the Respondent got refund of SAD in terms of Section 27 of the Customs Act and it was granted belatedly, he will also be eligible to get interest on SAD refund in terms of Section 27A of the Customs Act.

(Author can be reached at Email:

Read Other Articles from CA Bimal Jain


Author Bio

More Under Custom Duty

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

October 2020