This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty justified for evading customs duty by wrongly availing benefits
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Bird Retail Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Import) (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Bird Retail Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Import) (CESTAT Delhi)
Conclusion: Adjudicating Authority was right in in imposing a penalty under the provision of Section 114A and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 as both the appellants were fully aware that M/s B Pvt. Ltd. was importing complete Segway electrically operated product in CKD condition by mis-declaring the same as CKD parts of components such as Power unit, transmission kit, etc. for evading customs duty by wrongly availing the benefit of the Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. dated 17/03/2012.
Held: Assessee was appointed ...
