Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCM Hyundai Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCM Hyundai Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that demand of interest under section 61(2)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 unsustainable as SCN is time barred. Facts- The appellant, was earlier a 100% EOU, had applied for De-Bonding of the unit into DTA vide letter dt. 29.11.2006 and paid appropriate duties on the capital goods, imported raw materials, finished stock, indigenous capital goods lying as stock. It was noticed that certain raw materials were lying in stock beyond the warehousing period of three years as prescribed under Section 61 of t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930