Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCM Hyundai Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCM Hyundai Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai held that demand of interest under section 61(2)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 unsustainable as SCN is time barred.

Facts- The appellant, was earlier a 100% EOU, had applied for De-Bonding of the unit into DTA vide letter dt. 29.11.2006 and paid appropriate duties on the capital goods, imported raw materials, finished stock, indigenous capital goods lying as stock. It

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31