Case Law Details
Case Name : DCM Hyundai Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCM Hyundai Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai held that demand of interest under section 61(2)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 unsustainable as SCN is time barred.
Facts- The appellant, was earlier a 100% EOU, had applied for De-Bonding of the unit into DTA vide letter dt. 29.11.2006 and paid appropriate duties on the capital goods, imported raw materials, finished stock, indigenous capital goods lying as stock. It was noticed that certain raw materials were lying in stock beyond the warehousing period of three years as prescribed under Section 61 of t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

