Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kafila Forge Ltd Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 52189 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/07/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kafila Forge Ltd Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)

CESTAT Delhi held that Universal Joints Parts to be used in transmission shaft, are more specifically covered under sub heading 8483 60 90 and not under heading 8708.

Facts- M/s Kafila Forge Ltd. (the appellant) filed a Bill of Entry No. 7800127 dated 13.12.2006 for clearance of goods declared as “U.J. Cross Part & U J Cross Cup part” claiming the classification to be under heading 8483 60 90 of the Customs Tariff. These goods weighed 24241.900 kgs and the assessable value was declared to be Rs. 31,63,822.01/-. The assessing officer objected the classification and passed an order classifying the said goods under CTH 8708 of the Customs Tariff. The appellant filed an appeal before the Commissioner(Appeals), who vide the impugned order upheld the said Order-in-Original.

Conclusion- Held that on comparison of the both the heading 8483 and 8708, the impugned goods i.e. Universal Joints Parts to be used in transmission shaft, are more specifically covered under sub heading 8483 60 90 whereas nothing specific is found in respect of these goods under the heading 8708.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT DELHI ORDER

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031