Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Books Submit Post Subscription
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax Kolkata ITAT Deletes Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) After Quantum Additions Were Fully Deleted Income Tax Understanding Trust Law in India: Formation, Registration & Governance Corporate Law No Justification Can Ever Justify Denial of A High Court Bench to West UP Goods and Services Tax ITAT Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition Where Sales Are Accepted & GST Records Support Purchases Goods and Services Tax Patna HC Upholds Section 74 Proceedings Despite Voluntary GST Payment Income Tax ITAT Deletes Sections 41 & 43 BMA Penalties for Bona Fide ESOP Disclosure Omission Income Tax Madras HC Dismisses Writ Against Section 153A Assessment, Cites Alternate Appeal Remedy Income Tax ITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme Compensation
Custom Duty

Classification of imported Fuel Cell System for use in manufacturing of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles

By Editor4 Custom Duty Judiciary December 7, 2022
Share:

Case Law Details

Case Name
In re TATA Motors Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai)
Appeal Number
Only available for paid members
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
Advance Rulings, CAAR
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement
In re TATA Motors Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) M/s. Tata Motors Limited (hereinafter referred as the Applicant) having its address at Geetanil, 13-19 Nagindas Master Road, Hutatama Chowk, Mumbai, 400001, is a leading automobile manufacturer and is engaged in manufacturing of a wide range of Commercial Vehicles and parts thereof for sale within India and abroad. They submitted an application for advance ruling — CAAR-1, under Customs Act, 1962 dated 06.09.2022 seeking ruling on the classification of Fuel Cell System proposed to be used in manufacturing of Hydrogen Fuel Cells Vehicles. 2. The applic...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement
Filed under

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Related Articles in Custom Duty
CESTAT Sets Aside Confiscation of Exotic Birds for Lack of Smuggling Proof

CESTAT Sets Aside Confiscation of Exotic Birds for Lack of Smuggling Proof

July 25, 2026
CESTAT Quashes Confiscation of Gold for Curable Advance Authorisation Lapse

CESTAT Quashes Confiscation of Gold for Curable Advance Authorisation Lapse

July 25, 2026
Defective PSIC Alone Cannot Justify Confiscation of Imported Scrap: CESTAT Chandigarh

Defective PSIC Alone Cannot Justify Confiscation of Imported Scrap: CESTAT Chandigarh

July 25, 2026
Delhi HC Affirms Confiscation of Gold Brought Without Declaration

Delhi HC Affirms Confiscation of Gold Brought Without Declaration

July 24, 2026
SC Dismissed Revenue Appeal on Quicklime Classification Under CTH 2522

SC Dismissed Revenue Appeal on Quicklime Classification Under CTH 2522

July 24, 2026
CESTAT Allows Classification of Imported Quicklime Under CTH 2522 10 00

CESTAT Allows Classification of Imported Quicklime Under CTH 2522 10 00

July 24, 2026
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *