Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Majhar Muzaffar Hussain Sayed Vs C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Majhar Muzaffar Hussain Sayed Vs C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

It is seen that all three notices have denied any knowledge of the transaction of presence of cigarettes in the containers. There is no specific primary evidence produced by revenue, except the statements, to establish that the notices were aware of the presence of cigarettes in the container. It was argued by Learned Counsel for Majhar Bhai that they had demanded the cross-examination of witnesses however the same was not allowed. Learned counsel argued that no

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31