M/s popat & Kotecha property & ORS. Vs Ashim Kumar Dey (Supreme Court of India) Issue- Whether after the amendment of the West Bengal premises Tenancy Act by Amendment Act No. 14 of 2001 with effect from 10th July, 2001 [which had incorporated sub-section (8) to Section 5] whether a tenant who defaults in payment of his/her share of municipal […]
We make it clear that the person selected as Member of the ITAT will continue till the age of 62 years and the person holding the post of President, shall continue till the age of 65 years.
Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd. Vs CIT (Supreme Court of India) The CIT had no express power of cancellation of the registration certificate once granted by him to the assessee under section 12A till 1-10-2004. It is for the reasons that, first, there was no express provision in the Act vesting the CIT […]
The High Court has read the relevant clauses of the lease deed and has rightly come to the conclusion that payment which is to be made as annual rent is rent within the meaning of Section 194I, we do not find any infirmity in the aforesaid conclusion of the High Court. The High Court has rightly held that TDS shall be deducted on the payment of the lease rent to the Greater Noida as per Section 194I.
Hon’ble SC held that Though NOIDA is not a local authority, it is a corporation established by Act and so payments to it are not liable to TDS U/s.194A of Income Tax Act, 1961.
CIT, Ghaziabad Vs. Hapur Pilkhuwa Development Authority (Supreme Court) The Supreme Court on Monday imposed a fine of Rs. 10 Lakh on the Income Tax Department for its casual approach and for giving a totally misleading statement in the case. This petition for special to leave has been filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad. First […]
United india insurance co. Ltd. Vs Indiro devi & ors. (Supreme Court of India) There is no doubt that if the salary certificate is taken into account the salary of the deceased should be taken as Rs. 1,06,176/- since the gross salary was Rs.8848 per month. That, however, in our view does not mean that the income […]
Pr. CIT Vs Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. (Superme Court of India) Given Section 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, it is obvious that the Code will override anything inconsistent contained in any other enactment, including the Income-Tax Act. We may also refer in this Connection to Dena Bank vs. Bhikhabhai Prabhudas Parekh […]
On Monday, 06th August 2018, the Honourable Supreme Court has stayed Bombay High Court Interim Order for granting relief to Disqualified Director by admitting Special Leave Petition by Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
CIT Vs. Sunita Dhadda (Supreme High Court) HELD by the Supreme Court: We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Held by the Rajasthan High Court: 5. Counsel for the respondent has relied upon the following judgments :- “1. CIT VS. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, […]
