In re New Delhi Television limited (SEBI) Disclosure requirements have their root in the continuous listing requirements laid down in the listing agreement which prescribed that the information must be disclosed at the time of occurrence of the event in order to enable the shareholders and the public to appraise the position of the company, […]
In Re. Mr. Prannoy Roy & Mrs. Radhika Roy (SEBI) It is a fact on record that Mr. Prannoy Roy was the Managing Director/Promoter and Mrs. Radhika Roy was the Chairman/Promoter of NDTV during the UPSI period and were in possession of the UPSI (PSI-6). That the Noticees have purchased 4835850 shares of NDTV while […]
SEBI conducted an investigation into the trading activities of certain entities in Illiquid Stock Options at BSE for the period April 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015. It was observed that during the investigation period, total 2,91,643 trades comprising substantial 81.38% of all the trades executed in Stock Options Segment of BSE were found to […]
Avinash Chandra Trivedi Vs CPIO (SEBI Appellate Authority) It is observed that the Action History of the complaint reveals the action taken and the date-wise progress disposal of the complaint. It is understood that all the complaints which are lodged in the SCORES system and the related correspondence, can be accessed online on SCORES website […]
In re Deemed Public Issue Norms (Securities and Exchange Broad of India) Conclusion: Offer of RPS by the company and pursuant allotment were deemed public issue of securities under the first proviso to Section 67(3) of the Companies Act, therefore, all the noticees were jointly and severally with the company forthwith refund the money collected […]
Going by the facts narrated by Noticee No. 1, liquidation of 5 % stake was decided. The same had to be done in an orderly manner. There was no outer time fixed for liquidation. Being guided by the analysts reports and the price trends of the scrip, Noticee No. 1 decided to start the sale in November 2007.
In this case observed that having mutual friends on Facebook will form the basis of determination and to establish connection between the parties who have committed Insider Trading in Violation of SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015.
Since failure to make disclosure under each regulation constitutes independent offence attracting independent penalty, in the facts of present case, where there are multiple offences it would be just and proper to impose penalty for each offence independently depending upon the delay or default in making disclosures which are mandatory.
I further direct the attachment of all movable and immovable properties standing in the names of Shri Subrata Roy Sahara, Ms Vandana Bhargava, Shri Ravi Shanker Dubey and Shri Ashok Roy Choudhary with immediate effect. These individuals are directed to furnish details of all movable and immovable properties standing in their names within 21 days from the date of this order. Pending furnishing of this information, these individuals are restrained from alienating, disposing or in any manner encumbering the movable and immovable properties standing in their individual names.
