Pune Zilha Madhyawarti Sahakari Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune held that revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed as AO conducted detailed enquiry and after proper application of mind has taken one of the view legally permissible and concluded the assessment. Accordingly, appeal allowed. Facts- The […]
ITAT Pune cancels Section 271(1)(c) penalty against Vikas Jayram Bhukan, citing a defective notice that failed to specify the charge, referencing Bombay High Court precedents.
ITAT Pune ruled that employee leave encashment from government and non-government departments must be examined separately for tax exemption under Section 10(10AA).
ITAT Pune deletes ₹5.1 Cr income tax addition against Pradeep Runwal, ruling loose papers from a third-party search lacked corroborative evidence.
ITAT Pune reduced ad-hoc disallowances on salary, advertisement, vehicle, and travel expenses to 10% for Prafulla Shantilal Kothari, citing audited books and no specific defects.
ITAT Pune held that delay of 02 seconds in filing income tax return [ITR] is to be condoned and return is to be treated as filed in time as delay was caused due to technical glitch and last hour rush in website. Accordingly, claim of carry forward business loss allowed.
ITAT Pune condones delay, restores six appeals to CIT(A) for merit-based decision, citing non-compliance with Section 250(6) and assessee’s health.
ITAT Pune held that denial of exemption under section 10(23C)(v) of the Income Tax Act for belated filing of Form No. 10BB not justified as audit report in Form No. 10BB was submitted before completion of assessment proceedings. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Pune directed appellant to prove genuineness of activities; details of donations received and file audited financial statements for getting approval for regular registration u/s.12A r.w.s.12AB of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, matter remitted back.
ITAT Pune held that rectification order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act passed without providing an opportunity of being heard is bad-in-law and deserved to be set aside. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
