Case Law Details
Case Name : Kishor Digambar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Kishor Digambar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
In the consolidated appeals for Assessment Years 2017–18 and 2018–19, Kishor Digambar Patil vs. ITO, the assessee challenged penalty orders passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) under Section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalties, imposed at 200% of the tax on under-reported income, amounted to ₹1,64,392. These were levied on the basis that the difference between the income reported in response to notice under Section 148 and the revised return filed under Section 139(5) constituted “misreporting” a
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.