Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kishor Digambar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kishor Digambar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

In the consolidated appeals for Assessment Years 2017–18 and 2018–19, Kishor Digambar Patil vs. ITO, the assessee challenged penalty orders passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) under Section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalties, imposed at 200% of the tax on under-reported income, amounted to ₹1,64,392. These were levied on the basis that the difference between the income reported in response to notice under Section 148 and the revised return filed under Section 139(5) constituted “misreporting” a

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930