Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty Orders Invalid Due to Failure to Specify specific Default Under Section 270A(9)

Case Law Details

Case Name
Annasaheb Namdeo Gunjal Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
21/10/2024
Advertisement
Annasaheb Namdeo Gunjal Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) In the appeals filed by Annasaheb Namdeo Gunjal for Assessment Year 2017-18, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune, examined the legitimacy of penalties levied under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act. The penalties, amounting to ₹2,02,118 and ₹11,16,390 respectively, were imposed for alleged under-reporting of income attributed to misreporting. The core issue raised by the assessee was the procedural deficiency in the penalty orders—specifically, the Assessing Officer (AO) had not specified which of the six limbs under Section 270A(9)(...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *