DCIT Vs Shalaka Infra Tech (India) Pvt Ltd (ITAT Pune) Whether the CIT(A) is justified in deleting the disallowance of Rs.1,68,87,175/- as against Rs.1,88,63,786/- made by the AO on account of labour expenses in the facts and circumstances of the case. Heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We note that […]
ACIT Vs ISMT Limited (ITAT Pune) It is settled position of law that the Assessing Officer cannot rely on the same books of accounts which are rejected for the purpose of making any other additions as held by the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Indwell Constructions vs. CIT, 232 ITR 776 […]
GRI Renewable Industries S.L. Vs ACIT (IT) (ITAT Pune) It is seen that the assessee offered its income from ‘royalties’ and ‘fees for technical services’ on gross basis, albeit at the concessional rate of tax. The assessee claimed that a sum of Rs.35.67 lakh was received as reimbursement of expenses which was not liable to […]
Vanderlande Industries Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) A cursory glance at the definition of the term `Royalties’ makes it patent that the hitherto content of para 4 of Article 12 comprising of copyright royalty cases only became subject matter of sub-para (a) of the amended para 4 of Article 12. In addition, para 4(b) […]
ITAT Pune rules in favor of Ankit Enterprises, citing the treatment of unsold flats as stock-in-trade. Deemed rent addition not applicable.
Ganesh Balkrishna Bende Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Here is a case in which a salaried person pooled his lifelong endeavour for the further studies of his daughter. In such a panorama, a holistic approach needs to be adopted. When I consider the facts of the instant case as a whole, there remains no doubt whatsoever […]
Appeal by Anita Oberai against CIT(A) denial of exemption u/s.54F for two adjacent flats purchased. ITAT Pune sets aside the order in favor of the assessee.
BMC Software Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) The brief facts relating to the issue are that the assessee is a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore and is a tax resident of Singapore, therefore, the assessee is a non-resident from an Indian Income-tax perspective. We note that the assessee declared an […]
Smt. Preeti Rathi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The first issue raised herein is against not allowing deduction towards brokerage of Rs.80,000/- paid by the assessee at the time of purchase of the property in the computation of capital gain towards. The claim of the assessee is that she paid a sum of Rs.80,000/- as brokerage […]
Sansthan Shree Eknath Maharaj Vishwastha Mandal Vs ITO (Exemption) (ITAT Pune) There is no dispute on the fact that the assessee filed its return of income on 17.01.2017 for the year under consideration. The approval was granted by the ld. CIT(E) u/s 12AA on 16.05.2017. At this stage, it is relevant to take note of […]
